SUBSCRIBER-ONLY -- To read this article you must subscribe to COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS ADVISOR or E-DISCOVERY ADVISOR or LAW TECH ADVISOR or DATABASED ADVISOR.
If you are a Subscriber, sign-in to view the complete article and access any Download. You can subscribe at
Advisor Store. To activate your
subscriber online access, contact
Advisor Customer Service.
About this Article:
When it comes to electronic discovery document review, something surprising and a bit scandalous comes to light: The average document review contains a lot of bad decisions that can be extremely costly. These bad decisions can result in documents being incorrectly identified as relevant vs. irrelevant, inaccurately issue-coded or, worse, improperly tagged as responsive when they should have been marked as confidential or privileged.
Peter McLaughlin is an Engagement Manager in Fios, Inc.’s Discovery Management Services consulting group. He has more than 15 years experience training corporate clients and law firms in process improvement, corporate programs, and technology implementations. As the leader of the Review Management Services team, Peter counsels clients on review strategies and implementations that lower overall e-discovery costs, risks, and time.